DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-015
TIS 5 yrs, 3 months, 9 days
Policy Implications None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to making False Official Statements, substandard
performance, and an attempt to compromise an End of Course Test.
The applicant received two NJP’s over an 8 month period. In late 2009, the applicant knowingly created false
invoices for the procurement files, and submitted them to the supervisor with the intent that the invoices be
accepted as legitimate company invoices. Thereafter, the member was restricted to the assigned unit for 21
days, reduction to pay-grade: E-3, extra duties for 21 days, reduction in Pay Grade suspended for 06 months. In
the summer of 2010, just 6 months later, the applicant did with the intent to cheat on the Storekeeper Second
Class End-Of-Course Test write 24 of the 25 test questions and answers on scratch paper and try to remove
from the written item from the testing facility. This violated Coast Guard testing policy and procedures.
Removal of the scratch paper would have resulted in a test compromise. Applicant was reduced to Pay Grade
E-2 as a result of this NJP.
Prior to the two NJP’s, the applicant was counseled on poor performance between the Fall of 2008 and Spring
of 2010. At that time, the applicant was placed on performance probation due to neglecting budget
responsibilities, spending hours on the internet during the work day, and being unprepared/untimely for basic
collateral duties. In short, the applicant had been a burden to the command leading up to the discipline actions.
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant was notified of the intent to
discharge, and the applicant was advised of the rights to an attorney. The applicant was afforded to make a
detailed statement on their behalf. The Board voted unanimously to recommend no relief.
‘
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Concurs with Board. No relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001281
She stated, in part: * in May 2010, after completing an online application, she was issued a GTC prior to attending DSS * on 19 May 2010, she was granted a divorce * her agreement with her former spouse was that he would take care of their children until she finished training * DSS began on 8 June 2010, and she provided her GTC during in-processing for Army Lodging * in June, her former spouse decided he didn't want to care for their children any longer and dropped them off with her * around...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021267
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests: * removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 18 April 2011, from his official military personnel file (OMPF) * removal of a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR) from his OMPF * reinstatement of his rank/grade to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 2. This act is within the 2-year statute of limitations...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00247
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. As a result, I imposed nonjudicial punishment on 30 Sep 03, which consisted of a reduction to the grade of Airman Basic (E-I), new date of rank 30 Sep 03, suspended forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for 2 months, and restriction to the limits of MASTER OF...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00467
I SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 bI%O\I' SECRETARY OF TllE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COIINCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WINC, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) P r e v i o u s e d i t i o n w i l l be used I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NIJMBER FD-2006-00467 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017125
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110017125 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Also on 8 August 2011, the applicant's immediate commander initiated a DA Form 4187 requesting the applicant's promotion to SSG be revoked. He added: * The applicant was not given due process as the command had no authority to reduce her * The command did not conduct an administrative reduction board as required by Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027845
The applicant requests: * reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 in the Arizona Army National Guard (AZARNG) * removal of the Arizona Nonjudicial Punishment (AZNJP) Form 1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 26-1015, Arizona Code of Military Justice (ACMJ)), dated 1 July 2010, from his official military personnel file (OMPF) * payment of special duty additional pay (SDAP) for the months of April, May, and June 2010 (recruiter pay) * opportunity to compete for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013843
On 14 April 2010, the applicant was issued an administrative Memorandum of Reprimand (MOR) from her battalion commander for dereliction of her duties between 24 July 2009 and 13 January 2010. As a result of her Article 15 hearing she was found guilty of failing to submit a report to her battalion commander on or about 14 December 2009. She disputes this finding based upon the facts that: (1) the Army Regulation 15-6 investigation indicated she had been a Human Resources Clerk for over 9...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00272
- 7 I DENY ( INDEX NUMBER A49.00 A67.90 HEARING DATE 28 Oct 2003 CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00272 I I I Case heard at Washington, D.C. X ; a ~ p I ORDER APPOMTMG THE BOARD APPLlCATlON FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE I;:,%.. 1 2 3 1 LETTER OF NOTlFlCATlON 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE ~ @ ~ ~ J @ Q ~ %@ ~ COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE I APWCANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISiONM RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00394
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise this right. Applicant contends during his military career, he made some bad decisions, he was young and dumb and didn't have a family yet, and hc now has a family and purpose, currently works for Social Security, and has a career and wants to continue to grow. LOR, 14 NOV 95 - Financial irresponsibility.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 036
sale — ell DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-036 TIS 1 yrs, 9 months, 15 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure due to refusing further treatment for substance abuse. The command sent the applicant for a substance abuse screening at the nearby US Naval Hospital. A separate administrative remarks entry indicates that the applicant refused treatment on that same day in the summer of 2010.